From the AFT CT Blog

From the AFT Connecticut Blog
- Matt O'Connor

Lighting a fire under the state’s largest employer requires a deliberate strategy and an engaged membership. This latest collective bargaining report highlights the gains made by nine AFT Connecticut-affiliated public employee unions and chapters. It is a blueprint for how tens of thousands of working people can win a better future – a model adaptable to any labor organization.

Most units within the State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition (SEBAC) began preparing in late 2024 for contracts expiring in July 2025. Union leaders pooled resources and shared strategies across executive and judicial branch agencies and higher education institutions. This unified approach sustained bargaining teams even after current contracts expired.

Optimism grew last winter when the Judicial Professionals Employees (JPE) Union won an arbitration award for a one-year agreement after declaring impasse.

“This award absolutely sets a precedent for the fair wages all state employees deserve,” JPE President Rob Moreau said at the time. “It also sends a clear message to Governor Lamont that he should take negotiations seriously and offer honorable contracts that reflect workforce needs beyond one year.”

However, negotiations dragged into 2026, risking further delays if settlements weren’t reached before the legislative session adjourned. In mid-March, union leaders mobilized a massive demonstration in Hartford to move the needle. 

Emceeing the event, State Vocational Federation of Teachers President and AFT Connecticut Vice President for Public Employees Makenzi Hurtado (at podium, in photo, above) delivered the coalition’s demands.

“Together, we’re calling on Governor Lamont and outside employers to make recruiting, retaining and reinvesting in the workforce who provide ‘The Connecticut Difference’ a priority. My hope for my children’s and all our children’s futures is that they will have options available for them, and strong, stable services they can depend on throughout their lives.”

Within weeks, 32 tentative agreements were reached. These three- and four-year contracts followed a uniform framework for annual salary increases while securing unit-specific benefits won by individual negotiating committees.

“This contract proves that improving faculty working conditions directly enriches student learning opportunities,” said UConn-AAUP Executive Vice President Andrew Bush. “By securing guaranteed paid parental leave for the first time in our chapter’s history, we have moved beyond traditional labor gains to ‘Bargaining for the Common Good.’”

Members ratified the agreements by strong majorities, and legislative leaders quickly scheduled hearings. Administrative & Residual (A&R) Employees Union President John Disette noted the high political stakes.

“The fact that our contracts are being considered by state lawmakers in the middle of yet another partial federal government shutdown should not be lost on anyone,” he said. “When Washington undermines federal protections, reinvesting in Connecticut’s state workforce matters more than ever.”

The resolution won approval in both chambers, receiving support largely along party lines. Four-year contract provisions are retroactive to July 1, 2025, while three-year agreements take effect July 1, 2026. The framework includes a reopener to determine salaries for the final year of the pacts.

We celebrated our affiliates’ contracts – several of which were secured with the support of AFT Connecticut Field Representative Emily Demicco and legal counsel Eric Chester – on social media:

A&R Employees Union Association of Connecticut Assistant Attorneys General (AAGs) CSU-AAUP Local 6745 JPE Union State Vocational Federation of Teachers UConn-AAUP UCHC-AAUP University Health Professionals (UHP) University of Connecticut Professional Employees Association (UCPEA)

(Editor’s note: at press time, an arbitration decision regarding the contract for our tenth state employee union affiliate, the Federation of Technical College Teachers, had not been reached).

Since our January report, two additional affiliates have also announced wins:

American School for the Deaf Federation of Teachers EastConn Federation of Teachers

A future report is expected to include four additional pending settlements and a recent arbitration victory.

The post Recruiting, Retaining and Reinvesting in the Workforce first appeared on AFT Connecticut.

- Matt O'Connor

The excessive compensation doled out to the chiefs of the state’s largest non-profit health networks underscores the industry’s chronic disinvestment in direct clinical caregivers and support personnel. Andrea Riley, RN (speaking in photo, above), called out the two worst offenders in a recently published op-ed. The president of our AFT Connecticut-affiliated Windham Hospital Federation of Professional Nurses urged redirecting patient care dollars to “the people working at the bedside in our community:”

It would take a nurse nearly 60 years to earn what the CEOs of Hartford HealthCare (HHC) and Yale New Haven Health Systems (YNHHS) banked just last year. Let that sink in. 

When faced with a staffing crisis that threatens the operations of every healthcare facility in the country, and despite recent messaging on the financial stress facing Connecticut’s hospitals, two of our state’s largest nonprofit health networks opted to give their top executives significant pay hikes instead of working to recruit, retain, and reinvest in their workforce. 

A recent article noted that HHC CEO Jeffrey Flaks – who is not a licensed practitioner – saw a 22.2% increase in his total compensation, taking in over $5 million in FY 2025. Meanwhile, YNHHS CEO Christopher O’Connor – also, not a licensed caregiver – received over $6 million in 2025, a 22.1% increase over the previous year. For context, a registered nurse working in Connecticut makes, on average, about $40.02 an hour. This comparison doesn’t even scratch the surface of wage disparities across the many other job titles among hospital staff.

Yet services to communities continue to be cut, as has been the case at Windham Community Memorial Hospital (WCMH), the Hartford HealthCare-owned facility where I’ve invested my career in bedside care. Since the network’s take-over in 2008, devastating cuts have been made to our Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and Labor & Delivery departments. Clinical personnel have been laid off and many departments continue to work chronically short-staffed

Surprisingly, these executives’ lavish raises don’t seem to be tied to the financial security of the systems they oversee. According to the article, YNHHS reported nearly $200 million in operating losses for the fiscal year 2025.

If hospital administrators truly believe that these CEO raises “enable us to continue attracting and maintaining a world-renowned executive leadership team,” then why do they not apply that same principle to the bedside staff actually performing life-saving work?

A Yale spokesperson explains that compensation of YNHHS senior leaders is set by their Board of Trustees. It should be further pointed out that hospital boards are not publicly elected, as is the case with boards of education or town councils. Nonprofit hospital boards are often self-perpetuating; when there are openings, the current board members typically hand-pick the replacement. Yet, like boards of education and town councils, hospitals are predominantly financed with public dollars, through Medicare, Medicaid and patients’ insurance premiums. 

It is not uncommon for senior executives to serve on multiple boards. For instance, the Connecticut Hospital Association (CHA) executive committee comprises several HHC and Yale senior executives. To be clear, that’s four of its nine executive committee members and six of its 12 trustee seats. In fact, Flaks is Vice Chair and O’Connor is the Immediate Past Chair.

CHA claims that “top-tier talent, as challenges grow, is fundamental to protecting patient care, workforce stability, and access to essential services.” We can actually agree on this, but the members of our union believe the emphasis should be placed on the people working at the bedside in our community, not the senior executives in their boardrooms.

The post Reining in Runaway Executive Pay is Long Overdue first appeared on AFT Connecticut.

- Matt O'Connor

After surviving a harrowing bedside assault that left her with lasting physical and emotional scars, a courageous healthcare union member is refusing to remain silent. Amber De Souza (left, in photo, above), a constitutional delegate for our AFT Connecticut-affiliated Backus Federation of Nurses, is transforming a personal trauma into a powerful demand for employers to implement standardized violence prevention. In a recent blog post for our national union’s Medium blog, she shared her story to help bring about real solutions for “a systems failure:”

Amber De Souza still remembers how steady she felt that night.

After almost two years in nursing, she had learned to trust her instincts. She had admitted this patient days earlier, watched their condition improve, and noted the small setbacks and adjustments that come with being in the hospital. She was working the night shift now – confident, prepared, doing what nurses do: tracking details, reading people, and staying one step ahead.

Before nursing, De Souza was a mother. She went back to school after having her boys, now 14 and 11. Nursing was her second career, but it had been shaped long before she ever put on scrubs — back when her youngest brother was 17 and fighting T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. For months, she watched nurses care for him, and for her family, with a tenderness she never forgot. When he died, the dedication of nurses stayed with her. Years later, those memories pulled her into the profession.

She wanted to be that person for someone else.

A routine moment, and then it wasn’t

At the start of her shift at William W. Backus Hospital in Norwich, nothing felt unusual. The day shift nurse mentioned her patient had grown more agitated – restless, pulling at lines, frustrated about being in bed. A sitter had been placed in the room to keep things safe. During the safety sweep, everything checked out. The patient answered orientation questions correctly and a family member sat quietly nearby.

De Souza moved on to see her other patients.

Then she heard raised voices from the room next door. The patient was trying to get out of bed. De Souza stepped back inside, reintroduced herself, asked orientation questions again. The answers were clear. The patient wasn’t confused – just frustrated.

De Souza asked two patient care techs standing outside the room to help reposition the patient, to make them more comfortable. It was a routine moment, one that nurses navigate every day.

And then it wasn’t. The patient started swinging, and De Souza reacted instantly. She told the patient care techs to step back, this wasn’t safe – for them or for anyone. She called for help and turned toward the family member, explaining what needed to happen next. She took a step closer to the foot of the bed. The kick came fast. The patient lifted their leg and drove their heel into De Souza’s chest. The kick landed beneath her left breast and launched her backward. She slammed into the sitter behind her. If the sitter hadn’t been there, De Souza would have hit the floor.

“I remember seeing stars,” she says. “I couldn’t breathe.”

Everyone in the room froze. De Souza instinctively wrapped her arms around her ribs, trying to protect herself, trying to pull air into her lungs. Even then, her first thought was the patient — making sure they were safe. But the pain was too much.

She left the room. The charge nurse took over, and De Souza headed to the emergency room. In the ER, scans revealed a chest wall contusion, a bruised sternum, and a probable rib fracture. She went home believing she would heal. Three months later, she is still healing from nerve pain, spasms between her ribs and pain that radiates through her breast tissue.

Simple things – lifting, bending, twisting – are off limits. She’s back at work, not at the bedside, but on desk duty. It’s a role that feels foreign to someone who became a nurse to be hands-on.

At home, everything has shifted. Her children worry when she leaves for work. She worries about them worrying.

Emotionally, the weight of the incident lingers. The hospital offered five counseling sessions and because she already had a therapist, she continues the counseling. Trauma doesn’t disappear just because your shift ends.

“You leave your family to take care of other people’s families,” De Souza says. “You never expect to be hurt doing that.”

And yet, she keeps coming back.

She helps new nurses. She answers questions. When she notices warning signs others might miss, she speaks up, because she knows what happens when nurses are left alone in escalating situations.

Since the incident, the hospital has implemented what it calls an “agitation huddle,” meant to be initiated when a patient begins to escalate. In De Souza’s case, when she contacted her charge nurse and security was called, that response would technically qualify.

What continues to trouble her is what comes before that moment. De Souza thinks about how hospitals prepare for emergencies – like how sepsis triggers automatic protocols, staffing, and resources. She wonders why violence is treated differently. Why there isn’t a standard in place when agitation builds, when warning signs appear, when a nurse needs backup before something goes wrong.

“We have sepsis bundles,” De Souza says. “When a patient becomes septic, there are automatic orders and clear pathways. Nurses don’t have to stop and ask.”

With agitation and violence, that standard structure doesn’t exist, she says,. There are no standing protocols embedded in the chart – no pre-ordered support, no automatic escalation, no built-in authority to act early. Nurses are left managing risk in real time, often while caring for multiple patients.

The agitation huddle is one of the improvements De Souza’s local union has urged management to make through its workplace violence prevention committee. Union members insisted on union representation on the committee and a genuine effort to address rising violence in the facility. “Getting management to take the problem seriously, invest in prevention, and work with us is hard, but we are making some progress,” she says.

De Souza views this not only as someone who was injured but also as her unit’s representative for the hospital’s professional governance and a member of the workplace violence committee.

“This isn’t just personal,” she says. “It’s a systems failure – and it’s preventable.”

One of the hardest decisions ever

The incident led to one of the hardest decisions she’s ever made: whether to press charges. When a security guard first asked her, she couldn’t answer. How do you hold a patient accountable – someone you’re trained to protect? She replayed the incident over and over. At first, she couldn’t imagine it. The patient had been under her care. Nurses are trained to understand vulnerability, illness and fear. How do you hold someone accountable when your job is to protect them?

But the details wouldn’t leave her. The patient had been oriented, apologetic and aware. And the security guard offered a comparison she hadn’t considered: when a police officer or EMT is assaulted, circumstances don’t erase accountability. Why should nurses be different?

“If I don’t say anything,” says De Souza, “it’s the next nurse. The next patient care tech.”

She pressed charges but remains conflicted, still carrying the weight of that decision.

What steadied her was her union. The union leadership guided her through workers’ compensation, medical care, and the maze of expectations that followed. The hospital’s first official email explaining how to access occupational health arrived two weeks after the assault. Two weeks of uncertainty. Two weeks of unanswered questions.

Instead, De Souza found herself retelling the story again and again – to HR, legal, managers, doctors, insurance. Each retelling reopened the wound.

“There has to be a better way,” she says. “And I say that because if it weren’t for my union, I would have been totally lost in what was expected of me. Through the solidarity of our union, I found the support I needed.”

De Souza didn’t choose nursing because it was safe or easy. She chose it because she believes in care – deeply, stubbornly, even now. But she also believes compassion should never require silence, and care should never come at the cost of a caregiver’s safety.

She still shows up. But she’s no longer quiet about what needs to change. De Souza is clear about what needs to change: zero tolerance for violence, standardized support for injured healthcare workers, clear communication, and systems that protect caregivers as fiercely as they protect patients.

“There should be a standard of care for healthcare workers,” she says. “End of story.”

Editor’s note: original post by Adrienne Coles, AFT.

The post Demanding a Workplace “Standard of Care” first appeared on AFT Connecticut.

- Matt O'Connor

Union leaders, school officials, and administrators are sounding a collective alarm: state and federal cuts are pushing public education to the brink. Late last month, members of AFT Connecticut affiliates gathered in Hartford for the 2026 CT Education Issues Summit to demand the investment and protections our students and educators deserve.

The January 28 event was co-organized with the Connecticut Education Association (CEA) and advocacy partners in the Connecticut Association Boards of Education (CABE) and the Connecticut Association of Public School Superintendents (CAPSS). The purpose was to elevate real solutions for a workforce under strain and a looming funding crisis.

“Educators and support personnel are being asked to do more with less at a time when students need more than ever,” said AFT Connecticut Vice President for PreK-12 Leslie Blatteau (left, in collage, above). “Chronic disinvestment and political attacks from Washington have pushed schools to a breaking point. We are demanding that leaders act now to protect our kids and communities.”

The Workforce Crisis

The day opened with a deep dive into the recruitment and retention crisis. Panels featuring PSRP and higher education members highlighted how stagnant compensation and top-down mandates are driving talented professionals out of the classroom.

Don Akew (second from left, above), Meriden Federation of Paraprofessionals member, said, “you have to decide if you’re going to do something you love, like working with kids, because that doesn’t pay the bills. Especially new paras are forced to decide if they’re gonna stick around. I’ve seen many great paras just bow out after a year because they couldn’t figure out how to make things work.”

Jan Perruccio (second from right, above), CSU-AAUP member, added, “once we get people in the profession, give them a seat at the table. Constantly having top-down mandates really begins to erode educators’ feelings that they are important. Sometimes they find themselves doing things in the classroom that don’t make sense for their children.”

Defending the Freedom to Teach

The conversation shifted to the increasing politicization of the classroom. Former U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona shared national insights, followed by a discussion on the importance of maintaining job protections against censorship and “cancel culture.”

“We should always have encouraged more debate, dialogue and dissenting opinion,” said Quinnipiac AAUP member Sujata Gadkar-Wilcox (right, above). “Maybe we shouldn’t have been so quick to ‘cancel’ and dismiss controversial speakers. There has to be a place for figuring out how we can allow controversy to have a space for dialogue.”

The Privatization Threat

A “working lunch” moderated by AFT Connecticut President Jan Hochadel featured national AFT President Randi Weingarten, U.S. Rep. Jahana Hayes, and author Josh Cowen. The panel focused on the dangers of the federal “One, Big Beautiful Bill Act” and the expansion of tax credits that drain resources from public schools.

Cowen described voucher schemes as a bait-and-switch for families.

“Why I call vouchers education’s version of predatory lending is that it gives parents this false hope that everybody’s gonna go to the Hotchkiss School,” he said. But, in fact, you take the coupon, and there’s no ‘room at the inn’ for you. That’s the most dangerous and insidious part of this.”

The Path Forward

The summit concluded with a unified mandate: lawmakers must prioritize public education investment and safeguard the profession before further damage is done. Our members remain committed to leading this charge in the legislature and in our communities.

Editor’s note: includes contributions by Lesia Day, CEA.

The post Uniting to “Protect Our Kids and Communities” first appeared on AFT Connecticut.

- Matt O'Connor

Power at the bargaining table is built in the workplace, at city hall and in the community long before negotiations begin. Our latest quarterly collective bargaining report highlights how one PreK-12 affiliate used year-long organizing and tactical escalation to secure a major victory on the brink of arbitration. Their story offers tangible lessons for labor activists seeking to build the rank-and-file power necessary to make long-term economic gains and worksite improvements.

Leaders of our AFT Connecticut-affiliated New Haven Federation of Teachers launched their campaign with a clear goal: engage members at an unprecedented scale to settle before the statutory arbitration deadline.

“We see opportunities for hands-on learning in everything we do, and this most recent round of negotiations was no exception,” said local union President Leslie Blatteau (front row, third from left, in photo above). “That is why we opened up the process. We started last January, meeting regularly and surveying over 80% of our members to ensure that it’s not just union leadership at the table. The voices, needs and concerns of our members – and our students – were front and center.”

Talks began in September with support from both AFT Connecticut Field Representative Emily Demicco and legal counsel Eric Chester. Despite the union’s proactive approach, district administrators stalled, rejecting reasonable proposals designed to improve both student learning environments and educator working conditions.

By mid-December, after months of district foot-dragging, the negotiating committee declared an impasse. They took the fight to the public, holding a City Hall press conference to demand that elected officials avert mandatory arbitration.

“We must do better – and we can do it together if we act fast,” Ben Scudder (second from left, back row, above) told a crowd of city and district officials, reporters and union members. “There is still a chance for us to negotiate a contract that truly reflects the best interests of our students. New Haven cannot afford to lose hundreds of teachers – like me. But if we don’t negotiate a fair contract, we will. And it will be our students who pay the price.”

The political pressure worked. Days before arbitration was set to begin, the committee and the district reached a tentative three-year agreement.

Key wins in the new contract include:

General Wage Increases: Raises above the state average with annual step movement for all members. Healthcare Savings: A shift to allocation rates that reduce employee costs over the life of the contract. Work-Life Balance: Preserved workday schedules, pre-holiday early dismissals, and protected time for itinerant members and pre-school preparation. Future Protections: A commitment to meet in year two to address class size and enrollment issues.

“We also know there is still a lot of work to be done,” said local union Vice President Jenny Graves (front row, second from left, above). “In the richest state in the richest country in the world, our students should receive a world-class education and safe and welcoming schools that are fully staffed. However, we are the unfortunate characters in the tale of two Connecticuts where wealthy communities thrive, and communities like New Haven struggle to make ends meet.”

Union members overwhelmingly ratified the pact earlier this month. The contract, subsequently approved by the Board of Education, takes effect July 1.

Since our October report, five more affiliates have announced collective bargaining wins:

Meriden Federation of Teachers West Hartford Federation of Residential Counselors Meriden Federation of School-Based Registered Nurses North Branford Federation of Teachers Salem Federation of Teachers

Two additional pending and finalized settlements, as well as a grievance case win, will be included in a future update.

The post Mobilizing Early and Often to Force a Fair Contract first appeared on AFT Connecticut.